@article{oai:kanazawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00042077,
 author = {大貝, 和裕 and 松本, 勝 and 小林, 正和 and 須釜, 淳子 and Ogai, Kazuhiro and Matsumoto, Masaru and Aoki, Miku and Ota, Reina and Hashimoto, Kanae and Wada, Risa and Kobayashi, Masato and Sugama, Junko},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {Skin Research and Technology},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {Background/purpose: Presently, skin-cleaning agents that claim to be removed by water or wiping alone are commercially available and have been used for the purpose of bed baths. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how water washing and wiping differently affect skin physiological functions or ceramide content. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of water washing and wiping on skin physiological functions and ceramide content. Methods: Three kinds of the cleaning agents with different removal techniques (ie, water washing and wiping) were used in this study. Skin physiological functions (ie, transepidermal water loss, skin hydration, and skin pH) and skin ceramide content were measured before and after seven consecutive days of the application of each cleaning agent. Results: No significant differences in skin physiological functions or ceramide content were observed between water washing and wiping. Conclusion: Cleaning agents that claim to be removed by water washing or wiping do not affect skin physiological functions or ceramide content by either removal method. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S., Embargo Period 12 months},
 pages = {519--524},
 title = {Wash or wipe? A comparative study of skin physiological changes between water washing and wiping after skin cleaning},
 volume = {23},
 year = {2017}
}