@article{oai:kanazawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00043950,
 author = {林, 研至 and 山岸, 正和 and Uchiyama, K. and Ino, H. and Hayashi, Kenshi and Fujioka, K. and Takabatake, S. and Yokawa, J. and Namura, M. and Mizuno S. and Tatami, R. and Kanaya, H. and Nitta, Y. and Michishita, I. and Hirase, H. and Ueda, K. and Aoyama, T. and Okeie, K. and Haraki, T. and Mori, K. and Araki, T. and Minamoto, M. and Oiwake, H. and Konno, Tetsuo and Sakata, Kenji and Kawashiri, Masa-aki and Yamagishi, Masakazu},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {Journal of International Medical Research},
 month = {},
 note = {Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a drug-eluting stent (DES) leads to less re-stenosis than PCI using a bare metal stent (BMS), however there is still controversy whether use of a DES for severe coronary disease leads to an acceptable outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). In this study 8159 lesions were treated in 6739 patients (mean age 68.9 years) with coronary artery disease. Use of a DES significantly decreased the re-stenosis rate compared with BMS in both DM (9.6% versus 21.3%) and non-DM (9.5% versus 17.1%) patients. The re-stenosis rate was significantly higher in DM than in non-DM patients in the BMS group but not in the DES group. There was no statistically significant difference in event-free survival after stenting of patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease between the BMS and DES groups. It was concluded that, compared with BMS, DES reduced re-stenosis in patients with DM, however, we advise careful treatment after using DES for severe coronary disease, including LMCA lesions, in patients with DM. © 2011 Field House Publishing LLP., 金沢大学医薬保健研究域医学系},
 pages = {549--557},
 title = {Impact of severe coronary disease associated or not associated with diabetes mellitus on outcome of interventional treatment using stents: Results from HERZ (heart research group of Kanazawa) analyses},
 volume = {39},
 year = {2011}
}