{"created":"2023-07-27T06:55:04.673950+00:00","id":50743,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"6ea581be-2af1-475c-9bc1-0fa95256c728"},"_deposit":{"created_by":18,"id":"50743","owners":[18],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"50743"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kanazawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00050743","sets":["2812:2813:2835"]},"author_link":["91876","91877"],"item_9_biblio_info_8":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1999-03","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageStart":"2p.","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"1997-1998","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"平成10(1998)年度 科学研究費補助金 基盤研究(C) 研究成果報告書"},{"bibliographic_title":"1998 Fiscal Year Final Research Report","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_creator_33":{"attribute_name":"著者別表示","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]}]},"item_9_description_21":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"(1) 雇用の弾力化と労働政策における規制緩和は労働基準,労働市場,雇用管理,労使関係の全領域にかかわる,従来の労働保護のための規制をゆるめることを意味している。労働者派遣事業の規制緩和は、構造的失業の解決をもたらすのではなく、むしろ失業と不安定雇用を増加させる畏れが強いこと、また民営職業紹介事業の自由化は雇用機会自体の拡大をもたらすものではないこと、民営業者は高い手数料を確保できる高賃金労働者に職業紹介の重点をおく傾向がみられることを示した。\n(2) イギリス、ドイツを対象にして、これまで民営職業紹介事業や労働者派遣事業の公認などの規制緩和がどのように進められてきたのか、それによって失業問題の改善にどのような役割を果たしたのか、増加した雇用の内容はどのようなものか等について、各国政府、経済団体の統計や資料、大学など研究機関の調査報告、労働組合の資料等を収集して分析した。また、新たにアメリカの雇用の弾力化にともなう雇用構造の変容、特に臨時雇用の増加が労使関係にたいしていかなる問題をもたらしているかについて考察した。\n(3) 民営職業紹介事業・労働者派遣事業に関するILO第181号条約について、1997年6月のILO総会での審議経過にさかのぼって検討を行い、新条約は民営職業紹介事業、労働者派遣事業の規制緩和を容認するだけではなく、これらの事業を利用する労働者や求職者の保護を図ることに主たる重点がおかれていることを明らかにした。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"A.In Japan flexibility of employment and deregulation of labor policies means to loosen regulations for protection of workers in the areas of labor standard, labor market, personnel management and industrial relations. We made it clear that, first, deregulation of worker dispatching business does not bring about the improvement of structural unemployment, but the increase of unemployment and precarious employment. Secondly, liberalization of private employment agency does not lead to the increase ofjobs. Thirdly fee-charging employment agents tend to prefer high paid employees to low paid ones as their target.\nB.We investigated the following points in the United Kingdom and Germany ; 1) how private employment agency and worker dispatching business have been liberalized in 1990s, 2) whether this liberalization has brought about the improvement of long term unemployment or not in the labor market, 3) what kinds of employment have increased by flexibility of employment policies. Moreover, we studied what kind of impact the increase of temporary employment in U.S.A had on the industrial relations.\nC.The new JILO Convention on private employment agency (no. 181) was adopted at International Labor Conference in 1997. Advocates of deregulation of labor policies consider that the new Convention intends the private employment agencies, but also to promote the protection ofjob seekers and dispatched workers through some records of the International Labor Conference in 1997.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_description_22":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"研究課題/領域番号:09630039, 研究期間(年度):1997-1998","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"出典：「民営職業紹介事業・労働者派遣事業の規則緩和とILO条約改正に関する国際比較研究」研究成果報告書　課題番号09630039\n  (KAKEN：科学研究費助成事業データベース（国立情報学研究所）)\n　　　本文データは著者版報告書より作成","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.24517/00057051","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_17":{"attribute_name":"公開者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"金沢大学人間社会研究域経済学経営学系"}]},"item_9_relation_28":{"attribute_name":"関連URI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/search/?qm=20104870"}],"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/search/?qm=20104870","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}},{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-09630039/"}],"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-09630039/","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}},{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/report/KAKENHI-PROJECT-09630039/096300391998kenkyu_seika_hokoku_gaiyo/"}],"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/report/KAKENHI-PROJECT-09630039/096300391998kenkyu_seika_hokoku_gaiyo/","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_9_version_type_25":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa","subitem_version_type":"AM"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2020-03-02"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"EC-PR-GOKA-K-kaken 1999-2p.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"76.8 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"EC-PR-GOKA-K-kaken 1999-2p.pdf","url":"https://kanazawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/50743/files/EC-PR-GOKA-K-kaken 1999-2p.pdf"},"version_id":"894d8831-20d9-454c-bf44-a46cd380828c"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"research report","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws"}]},"item_title":"民営職業紹介事業・労働者派遣事業の規則緩和とILO条約改正に関する国際比較研究","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"民営職業紹介事業・労働者派遣事業の規則緩和とILO条約改正に関する国際比較研究"},{"subitem_title":"International Comparative Research on the Deregulation of Private Employment Agency and the Revision of ILO Convention no.96","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"18","path":["2835"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2020-03-02"},"publish_date":"2020-03-02","publish_status":"0","recid":"50743","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["民営職業紹介事業・労働者派遣事業の規則緩和とILO条約改正に関する国際比較研究"],"weko_creator_id":"18","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-07-27T14:49:24.619250+00:00"}