WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
Factors associated with quality of bystander CPR: The presence of multiple rescuers and bystander-initiated CPR without instruction
http://hdl.handle.net/2297/39096
http://hdl.handle.net/2297/39096f4239df6-39cf-4319-89a1-29daa0881fd4
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ME-PR-TAKEI-Y-492.pdf (498.7 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-10-03 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Factors associated with quality of bystander CPR: The presence of multiple rescuers and bystander-initiated CPR without instruction | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 著者 |
Takei, Yutaka
× Takei, Yutaka× Nishi, Taiki× Matsubara, Hiroki× Hashimoto, Masaaki× Inaba, Hideo |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
Resuscitation 巻 85, 号 4, p. 492-498, 発行日 2014-04-01 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1873-1570 | |||||
| DOI | ||||||
| 関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
| 関連識別子 | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.019 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Elsevier | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Aims: To identify the factors associated with good-quality bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR). Methods: Data were prospectively collected from 553 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) managed with BCPR in the absence of emergency medical technicians (EMT) during 2012. The quality of BCPR was evaluated by EMTs at the scene and was assessed according to the standard recommendations for chest compressions, including proper hand positions, rates and depths. Results: Good-quality BCPR was more frequently confirmed in OHCAs that occurred in the central/urban region (56.3% [251/446] vs. 39.3% [42/107], p= 0.0015), had multiple rescuers (31.8% [142/446] vs. 11.2% [12/107], p< 0.0001) and received bystander-initiated BCPR (22.0% [98/446] vs. 5.6% [6/107], p< 0.0001). Good-quality BCPR was less frequently performed by family members (46.9% [209/446] vs. 67.3% [72/107], p= 0.0001), elderly bystanders (13.5% [60/446] vs. 28.0% [30/107], p= 0.0005) and in at-home OHCAs (51.1% [228/446] vs. 72.9% [78/107], p< 0.0001). BCPR duration was significantly longer in the good-quality group (median, 8 vs. 6. min, p= 0.0015). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that multiple rescuers (odds ratio. = 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.6), bystander-initiated BCPR (2.7, 1.1-7.3), non-elderly bystanders (1.9, 1.1-3.2), occurrence in the central region (2.1, 1.3-3.3) and duration of BCPR (1.1, 1.0-1.1) were associated with good-quality BCPR. Moreover, good-quality BCPR was initiated earlier after recognition/witness of cardiac arrest compared with poor-quality BCPR (3 vs. 4. min, p= 0.0052). The rate of neurologically favourable survival at one year was 2.7 and 0% in the good-quality and poor-quality groups, respectively (p= 0.1357). Conclusions: The presence of multiple rescuers and bystander-initiated CPR are predominantly associated with good-quality BCPR. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | AM | |||||